Abstract
In the context of reforming general secondary education in Ukraine, implementing the New Ukrainian School (NUS) concept, and facing the challenges of wartime, the problem of forming a stable professional identity of the teacher as a bearer and transmitter of humanistic values becomes paramount. The article focuses on concepts that are interrelated and complement one another, broadening and deepening the content of the identity phenomenon, yet described by some authors as synonymous: teacher identity, pedagogical identity, and professional identity of the teacher. Pedagogical identity is a systemic value of modern education. In the context of the NUS, a mature pedagogical identity ensures the implementation of partnership pedagogy, serves as a resource for the psychological resilience of teachers and students in wartime conditions, and is a prerequisite for the formation of students' national identity. A blurred pedagogical identity leads to a decline in the teacher's authority, the reproduction of authoritarian interaction models, and undermines the value potential of education. The article reveals the essence of the teacher's professional identity as a dynamic, value-driven construct occupying an intermediate position between personal and social identity. A four-component structure of pedagogical identity is presented (cognitive-reflective, value-semantic, emotional-affective, and behavioral-activity components), its criteria are defined (reflective-cognitive, value-semantic, emotional-identificatory, behavioral-authentic), along with three levels of identity formation (diffuse, forming, and mature). It is substantiated that a well-formed professional identity acts as a factor of the teacher's psychological readiness for creative activity, facilitates the free performance of professional functions, raises the level of aspirations, develops an individual style, and enables authentic subject-to-subject interaction within the 'teacher–student' system. Prospects for further research are seen in the development and testing of psychological support programs for the formation of teachers' professional identity within the continuing education system.
References
Bekh, I. D. (2012). Personality in the Space of Spiritual Development. Kyiv: Akademvydav [in Ukrainian].
Ball, H. O. (2006). Rational-Humanistic Orientation in the Methodology of Human Studies. Kyiv: SKD [in Ukrainian].
Ziaziun, I. A. (2008). Pedagogical Mastery (3rd ed., rev.). Kyiv: SPD Bohdanova A. M. [in Ukrainian].
Zlyvkov, V. L. Formation of the concept of 'professional identity' in domestic and foreign psychology. Psychology. Pedagogy, 3(39), 143–148 [in Ukrainian].
Linnik, O. O. (2012). Future Teacher and Student: Subject-to-Subject Interaction in the Educational Environment. Kyiv: Karavela [in Ukrainian].
Myronchuk, N. M. (2019). Readiness of future teachers for independent work in the axiological dimension. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, 2(96), 103–109 [in Ukrainian].
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2016). New Ukrainian School: Conceptual Principles of Secondary School Reform. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Pomytkin, E. O. (2007). Psychology of Spiritual Personality Development. Kyiv: Nash chas [in Ukrainian].
Rybalka, V. V. (1996). Psychology of Creative Personality Development. Kyiv: IZMN [in Ukrainian].
Radzimovska, O. V. (2012). Professional identity of the teacher as a factor of readiness for creative interaction in the 'teacher–student' system. Scientific Journal of the M. P. Drahomanov NPU. Series 12. Psychological Sciences, 10(34), 45–51 [in Ukrainian].
Savchyn, M. V. (2010). Spiritual Potential of a Person. Ivano-Frankivsk: Misto NV [in Ukrainian].
Day, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(1), 7–23.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to Learn for the 80's. Columbus: Charles Merrill Publishing Company.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Rushton, E., Reiss, M., & Mujtaba, T. (2023). Understanding teacher identity in teachers’ professional lives: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Education, 11, e3417. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3417
Wong, C. Y. E., & Liu, W. C. (2022). Evaluating the teacher professional identity of student teachers: Development and validation of the Teacher Professional Identity Scale. Journal of Education, 204(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574221101375
Banit, O., & Merzliakova, O. (2023). Identification the key strategies of resilience of Ukrainian teachers in the conditions of war. European Humanities Studies: State and Society, (1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2023.1.01
Ma, D. (2022). The role of motivation and commitment in teachers’ professional identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 910747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910747
Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Lukianenko, V., & Golub, T. (2022). Teaching during the wartime: Experience from Ukraine. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098714
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2024). How higher education teachers see their professional identity. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1429847. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1429847
Topuzov, O., Bibik, N., Lokshyna, O., & Onopriienko, O. (2024). Challenges of war for primary school teachers in Ukraine: Survey results. Education: Modern Discourses, 7, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2024-7-01

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Оксана Радзімовська
