Theoretical analysis of the problem of developing personal resilience
pdf

Keywords

resilience, psychological adaptation, personal resilience, personal resistance, defense mechanisms

How to Cite

Chukhrii, I., & Kravchuk, V. (2024). Theoretical analysis of the problem of developing personal resilience. Personality and Environmental Issues, 3(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-6033-2024-3(1)-12-17

Abstract

Military operations on the territory of Ukraine have a devastating impact on the entire population of the state. Daily shelling, participation in combat, loss of loved ones, and the experience of prolonged stressful situations affect all areas of the population's life and, in particular, their psychological and mental health. An important task of modern psychological science is to explore ways to develop constructive ways to overcome stressful situations and develop personal resilience and counteract difficult life circumstances.
In recent years, the study of the problem of resilience as the ability to resist life's difficulties has been actively developing. The study of this problem helps to solve many problems of practical psychology, since the development of resilience and the ability to resist stressful situations is a necessary component of the personality in wartime.
The article presents a theoretical generalization of scientific approaches to the study of the concept of resilience. The main directions in the study of resilience of foreign and domestic authors are revealed. Various factors and determinants that influence the development of resilience as a process of resistance to stress are analyzed. The historical dynamics of understanding and studying the concept of resilience and the study of the development of personality resilience are presented.
Based on the results of the theoretical analysis, we can distinguish the following scientific generalizations of the concept of resilience: it has a dynamic nature and biological basis, is an important prerequisite for successful adaptation and development of the individual, can be considered in social, biological or psychological aspects, its development depends not on the living conditions of a person, but on his/her perception of life difficulties, during the emergence of difficult living conditions, as well as in the process of experiencing life difficulties, a person is capable of post-traumatic growth and resilience.
There are four stages in the study of the concept of resilience:
1. Identification of signs based on longitudinal studies of children's defensive functions.
2. Identification of the process. During this stage, the focus of the study changes from defensive factors to consideration of human resilience processes.
3. The third stage is based on the first and second, it actively considers resilience as a mechanism that leads to positive human adaptation in adverse conditions.
4. The fourth stage was caused by the development of technologies that allowed to study resilience more qualitatively with the help of psychodiagnostic tools.
It has been established that resilience is an individual ability to counteract and find constructive methods of overcoming stressful situations, an important prerequisite for mental adaptation and personality development. Resilience depends on the influence of external (social) factors and individual psychological factors.

pdf

References

Bonnano G. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American psychologist 2004. no 59. P. 21-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20

Bolton K. Тhe development and validation of the resilience protective factors inventory: a confirmatory factor analysis. Kristin Whitehill Bolton. University of Texas at Arlington, 2013. 118 p.

Connor K. M., Davidson J. R. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 2003. 18. 76. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113

Fergus S, Zimmerman MA. Adolescent resilience: a framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk 2005. №26. P. 399-401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357

Luthar, S. S. & Cicchetti, D The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Developmental Psychology. 2000. Vol. 12. P. 857-855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004156

Masten A. Ordinary magic: resilience in development. New York: The Gulford press. 2014. - p. 308

Masten, A. S. Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 2007. Vol. 19. P. 921-930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442

Masten, A. S. Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 2007. Vol. 19. P. 921-930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442

Neenan, M. (2017). Developing resilience: A cognitive-behavioura lapproach. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189178

Werner E., Smith R. Overcoming the odds: high risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711992

Richardson, G. E. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of clinical psychology. 2002. Vol. 58(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020

Rutter M. Resilience in the face of adversity: protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1985. № 147. P.598-611. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.147.6.598

Ungar M. Resilience across Cultures The British Journal of Social Work, Volume 38, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Inna Chukhrii, Vlad Kravchuk

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.