Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The article considers a theoretical analysis of the concept of cohesion in the context of military formations. Cohesion is a key factor affecting the effectiveness of the functioning of military units, their ability to interact, perform combat missions and maintain the psychological stability of servicemen. The author reviews classical theories of group dynamics, in particular the works of L. Festinger, D. Cartwright and K. Levin, who laid the fundamental approaches to understanding this phenomenon.
The paper identifies the main components of group cohesion: emotional, instrumental and social. It shows how these aspects interact and form effective group interaction in military teams. Particular attention is paid to the specificity of cohesion in military formations, which is formed under the influence of strict discipline, common values, trust and mutual support in conditions of high stress.
Based on the analysis of modern research, factors that contribute to the development of cohesion in military groups are identified: the role of leadership, the importance of group norms, the influence of collective experience and training. The article also examines the main obstacles to the formation of cohesion, in particular conflicts, low levels of trust or poor leadership.
The study shows that cohesion in military formations is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness and psychological well-being of personnel. The findings can be useful for developing military training programs that will contribute to the formation of cohesive and psychologically resilient units.
References
Bilyk, S. I. (2021). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti zghurtovanosti u viiskovykh pidrozdilakh. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, 2(115), 29–36.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
Festinger, L. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford University Press.
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). Wiley.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
Manning, R., & Fullerton, A. S. (2018). Military cohesion and performance. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041234
Melnyk, I. O. (2019). Formuvannia zghurtovanosti u viiskovykh formuvanniakh: psykholohichni aspekty. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 4, 45–58.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin.
Siebold, G. L. (2007). The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X06294173
Wong, L., Bliese, P. D., & McGurk, D. (2003). Military leadership and cohesion. In Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat (Vol. 1, pp. 149–176). Praeger Security International.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Вадим Подорожний, Сергій Іванов