Articles
The Nationally Marked Component of the Concept of Sin and Atonement in Oleksa Storozhenko’s Whimsical Novel Marko the Accursed
https://doi.org/10.31652/Published 2025-01-01
Keywords
- Olexa Storozhenko,
- Marko the Accursed,
- chimeric novel,
- Gothic prose,
- Sin
- Atonement,
- Penance,
- national markedness,
- concept,
- mythopoetics,
- ancestral sacredness ...More
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright Holder Not Found

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
The Nationally Marked Component of the Concept of Sin and Atonement in Oleksa Storozhenko’s Whimsical Novel Marko the Accursed. (2025). Ukrainian Literature: Historical Experience and Perspectives, 6, 56-75. https://doi.org/10.31652/
Abstract
This article explores the nationally marked component of the concept of Sin and Atonement in Olexa Storozhenko’s chimeric novel «Marko the Accursed», a significant work of the Romantic era. The relevance of the research result of substantiating the genre affiliation of the work as a whimsical novel with elements of Gothic. The aim is to analyze the transformation of universal archetypes of evil and punishment based on Ukrainian folklore and Romantic aesthetics. The main findings of the study prove that the concept of Sin and Atonement acquires national specificity through: The Nature of Sin: Marko’s sin is conceptualized as the destruction of ancestral sacredness (incest, matricide, and fratricide), which constitutes the highest taboo in the Ukrainian moral code. The Form of Atonement (Penance): The punishment takes a unique physical, corporal materialization – the heads of the murdered relatives in a sack. The Motive of Exile: Marko's eternal wandering is interpreted as the refusal of Mother Earth to accept the sinner.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
- Balushok V. Arkhaichni vytoky obrazu Marko Prokliatyi. Slovo i Сhas. 1996. №. 11–12. S. 73–76.
- Vladymyrova V., Kyrylenko N. Folklornyi motyv hrikha-spokuty v suchasnii ukrainskii zhinochii prozi (na materiali romaniv Marii Matios, Liuko Dashvar, Oleny Pechornoi, Valentyny Mastierovoi). Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia : Filolohiia, 2018, vyp.19. S. 34–40.
- Dontsov D. Typ zaporozhtsia u O. Storozhenka. Dmytro Dontsov. Pravda pradidiv velykykh. Filadelfiia : Vydannia Holovnoi upravy Orhanizatsii oborony chotyrokh svobod Ukrainy, 1952 r. 96 s.
- Iehorchenko M. O. Motyv hrikha v poezii Vasylia Stusa. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. 2007. T. 72 : Filolohichni nauky, S. 24–32.
- Ilinska N. I. Etnokulturni kody mifolohemy Ahasvera v romani Oleksy Storozhenka «Marko Prokliatyi». Pivdennyi arkhiv. 2025, № 100. S. 64–78.
- Kononenko V. I. Mova u konteksti kultury. Monohrafiia. Kyiv-Ivano-Frankivsk, 2008. 390 s.
- Maksymchuk O. Pokaianni motyvy u propovidiakh Antoniia radyvylovskoho. Siverianskyi litopys 2022. № 5–6. S. 50–156.
- Nakhlik Ye. Ukrainska romantychna proza 20–60 rokiv XIX stolittia. Kyiv : Naukova dumka. 1988. 244 s.
- Poida O. A. Oleksa Storozhenko: narys zhyttia i tvorchosti. Vinnytsia : DP «Derzhavna kartohrafichna fabryka», 2008. 240 s.
- Prosalova V. A. Roman Oleksy Storozhenka «Marko Prokliatyi» na tli hotychnoi tradytsii» Naukovi zapysky Seriia: Filolohichni nauky Vypusk. 3(206), 2023. S. 121–127.
- Savchuk S. Kultura vyny. Filosofiia prava i zahalna teoriia prava. № 1–2, 2014. S. 442–451.
- Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy : v 11 t.; redkol. : I. K. Bilodid (holova) [ta in.]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, 1970–1980.
- Storozhenko O. Tvory. V 4 t. Kharkiv : Derzhvydav Ukrainy, 1928–1929.
- Reshetukha S. «Marko Prokliatyi» – roman-eksperyment (mifolohichnyi aspekt). Slovo i Chas. 2006. № 9. S. 34–39.
- Shvydka N. V. Reshetniak O. O. Verbalizatsiia kontseptu hrikh u bibliinomu y movnomu dyskursakh. Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia : Filolohiia. Zhurnalistyka. 2021. T. 32 (71), № 2, ch. 1. S. 77–82.
- Shcherbachuk L. Semantychnyi prostir kontseptu hrikh yak element dukhovnoho kodu (na materiali ukrainskoi frazeolohii) Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. 2012. № 1. S. 504–508.
