ENVIRONMENTAL COMFORT OF URBANIZED LANDSCAPES
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

urban landscape, compact and green city, urban green spaces, environmental comfort, built-up area-to-UGS ratio, Environmental Comfort Index

How to Cite

Shyshchenko П. Г., Havrylenko О. П., & Yesypchuk Д. В. (2023). ENVIRONMENTAL COMFORT OF URBANIZED LANDSCAPES. Landscape Science, (1(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2022-1-40-51

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to establish the degree of compliance of the urbanised landscapes of Kyiv and its administrative districts to the criteria of environmental comfort of a compact and green city. Study methods. The purpose was achieved using the following algorithm: the geospatial data of OpenStreetMap and the QGIS software were used to plot the urban green spaces (UGS) and built-up Kyiv territories a cartographic base. The development of real estate for different purposes and all available UGS were grouped into separate categories using the Union geoprocessing tool. The spatial data layers were reduced to a single cartographic projection using Field calculator to calculate the geometric characteristics of each category. Results. These calculations were used to find the building coverage and the green coverage ratios, and the built-up area-to-UGS ratio within the limits of Kyiv and its ten districts. Since the comfort of an urbanised landscape depends largely on the optimal ratio of UGS and developed territories, its highly non-uniform spatial distribution within Kyiv limits was found: a dense development prevails on the Right Bank, whereas UGS prevails on the outskirts and in some districts of the Left Bank. Based on the calculated green coverage and the building coverage ratios in different Kyiv districts, they were rated by the ratio of built-up and green coverage territories. The maximum green coverage is in the Desnianskyi district, and the most built-up one is in the Solomianskyi district. In general, four city districts are almost devoid of UGS due to absence of free territories for their full-scale development. To establish the degree of compliance of urbanised landscapes to the criteria of environmental comfort in each Kyiv’s district, the Environmental Comfort Index (ECI) was calculated. Its principal indicators are the average population density, building coverage and greenery coverage ratios, and emissions into the atmosphere from stationary pollution sources. Each indicator is assigned a certain number of points, enabling to calculate the ECI by the total of points of chosen indicators. The results obtained were used to build a rating of Kyiv’s districts according to the degree of their compliance to the criteria of environmental comfort of a compact and green city. The highest ECI are in the Obolonskyi and Desnianskyi districts, and the lowest are in the Solomianskyi, Pecherskyi and Shevchenkivskyi districts. The poor environmental comfort of these districts is largely due to their location in the centre of the city, with an almost dense development and high population density. Due to traffic congestion and concentration of sources of toxic emissions, the atmospheric air is very polluted. Due to displacement of UGS by construction sites, greenery is lacking everywhere, and it is often absent in the sanitary protection zones of industrial plants. The study novelty consists in finding the degree of conformity of Kyiv’s urbanised landscapes to the criteria of environmental comfort of a compact and green city. With this in view, the built-up area-to-UGS ratio was found for Kyiv and its ten districts, and corresponding map charts were compiled. ECI was calculated for each district to determine the ratings of Kyiv’s districts. The study results can be extrapolated to other cities in Ukraine.

https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2022-1-40-51
PDF (Українська)

References

Szmigiera M. Degree of urbanization (percentage of urban population in total population) by continent in 2020. Statista, 2021. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270860/urbanization-by-continent/

Cities and climate change. UNEP Official site. URL: https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/cities/cities-and-climate-change

Cities: a cause of and solution to climate change. UN News, 2019. URL: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/09/1046662

Urban green spaces and health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016. URL: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/321971/Urban-green-spaces-and-health-review-evidence.pdf

McCarthy M. P., Best M. J., Betts R. A. (2010). Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042845. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010GL042845

Izakovičová Z., Mederly P., Petrovič F. (2017). Long-term land use changes driven by urbanisation and their environmental effects (example of Trnava City, Slovakia). Sustainability, 9(9), 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091553. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1553

Haaland C., van den Bosch C. K. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 760-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009

Kyiv City Development Strategy until 2025 (new edition). URL: https://dei.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2017/7/28/Strategy2025new.pdf [In Ukrainian]. [Стратегія розвитку міста Києва до 2025 року (нова редакція)]

Draft Master Plan of the Kyiv city. Official site of Kyivgenplan, 2020. URL: http://kyivgenplan.grad.gov.ua/ [In Ukrainian]. [Проєкт Генерального плану міста Києва. Офіційний сайт КО «Київгенплан», 2020]

Roe J., Thompson C., Aspinall P., Brewer M., Duff E., Miller D., Mitchell R., Clow A. (2013). Green space and stress: Evidence from cortisol measures in deprived urban communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 4086–4103.

Palliwoda J., Priess J. A. (2021). What do people value in urban green? Linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices. Ecology and Society, 26(1):28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12204-260128

Chiesura A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003

Vaňo S., Olafsson A. S., Mederly P. (2021). Advancing urban green infrastructure through participatory integrated planning: A case from Slovakia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126957

Tappert S., Kloti T., Drilling M. (2018). Contested urban green spaces in the compact city: The (re-)negotiation of urban gardening in Swiss cities. Landscape and urban planning, 170, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.016

Borgström S.T., Elmqvist T., Angelstam P., Alfsen-Norodom C. (2006). Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society, 11(2):16. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art16/

Urban Green Space Interventions and Health. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017. URL: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/337690/FULL-REPORT-for-LLP.pdf

On approval of the Regulations on the creation and maintenance of buffer parks: Decision of the Kyiv City Council of March 9, 2006 № 172/3263. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MR060290 [In Ukrainian]. [Про затвердження Положення про створення та утримання буферних парків: Рішення Київської міської ради від 9.03.2006 року № 172/3263]

Ohorodnyk S. Draft General Plan of Kyiv: Kyivans against the destruction of Bilychansky forest and parks instead of the forest parks, 2020. URL: https://www.chesno.org/post/3951/ [In Ukrainian]. [Огородник С. Проєкт Генплану Києва: кияни проти знищення Біличанського лісу та парків замість лісопарків, 2020]

Tkachenko T. M., Hulei D. V. (2018). Green constructions as an effective way to stabilize and improve the environment of urban cenosis (on the example of Solomyansky district of Kyiv). Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 1(17), 46-56. URL: http://elar.nung.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/6396/1/ilovepdf_com-46-56.pdf [In Ukrainian]. [Ткаченко Т. М., Гулей Д. В. Зелені конструкції як ефективний спосіб стабілізації та поліпшення стану довкілля урбоценозів (на прикладі Солом’янського району м. Києва). Екологічна безпека та збалансоване ресурсокористування. 2018. № 1(17). С. 46-56]

Tkachenko T. M., Tkachenko O. A. (2019). Modern condition of using «green structures» in urbocenoses. Proceedings of Donbas National Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(15), 3-30. URL: https://donnaba.edu.ua/journal/images/1-2019-15/3.pdf [In Ukrainian]. [Ткаченко Т. М., Ткаченко О. А. Сучасний стан використання «зелених конструкцій» в урбоценозах. Збірник наукових праць ДонНАБА. 2019. № 1 (15) С. 3-30]

Population (estimated) on April 1, 2021 and average population in January-March 2021. Main Directorate of Statistics in Kyiv, 2020. URL: http://www.kiev.ukrstat.gov.ua/p.php3?c=1123&lang=1 [In Ukrainian]. [Чисельність населення (за оцінкою) на 1 квітня 2021 року та середня чисельність у січні-березні 2021 року. Головне управління статистики у м. Києві]

Emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from stationary sources by district in 2020. Main Directorate of Statistics in Kyiv, 2020. URL: http://kyiv.ukrstat.gov.ua/p.php3?c=3412&lang=1 [In Ukrainian]. [Викиди забруднюючих речовин і парникових газів в атмосферне повітря від стаціонарних джерел по районах у 2020 році. Головне управління статистики у м. Києві]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Петро Григорович Шищенко , Олена Петрівна Гавриленко , Дар`я Валентинівна Єсипчук