INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF REGULARITIES OF ORGANIZATION OF NATURAL TERRITORIAL SYSTEMS
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

internal structure of dependences, dynamics of ratio of direct and antinomic component, invariant of dependences.

How to Cite

Petlin В. М. (2023). INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF REGULARITIES OF ORGANIZATION OF NATURAL TERRITORIAL SYSTEMS. Landscape Science, (2(2), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2022-2-36-45

Abstract

The internal structure of dependencies that control the spatiotemporal organization of natural territorial systems is considered. It is noted that any of them is characterized by direct and antinom components. That is why such dependences are probabilistic. The presence of antinomies in many laws, regularities, principles, etc. Suggests that in the zone of probabilistic indirect action of dependences there are, and therefore dominate, asymmetric dependencies, with reverse action, which in some way balance the action of direct ones. This is a reflection of the principle that what is absolutely probable is never stable. The formations that make up the world and the dependencies that control their organization are not only characterized by systemic autonomy, but also by functional interconnection, that is, everything is in its place and performs only its inherent function. And in order for any phenomenon to be characterized by stability, it must be balanced by the opposite. This phenomenon is also characterized by dynamism and invariance. The dynamics of the ratio of direct and antinomic internal components is not only a manifestation of the general variability of nature, but also provides these dependencies with stability against the background of such variability. The invariance of any organizational dependence is a stable relationship between its direct and antinomic components. The destruction of such an invariant relationship leads to destructive phenomena within the framework of integral dependence, which can be much more detrimental to the organization of the landscape as a whole than, for example, its global pollution. These dependencies are the background for any territorial formations and form the basis for a significant set of other dependencies. In general, each of these dependences is characterized by a certain degree of probability of direct and antinomic components. The main set of organizational dependencies on natural territorial systems covers the patterns of formation of their integrity, internal and external balance against the background of continuous variability, systemicity of all components (from component content and structure to systemic integrity), spatial and temporal stability, internal geological equivalence background emergence. These properties of systems are considered in article. The analysis shows that the vast majority of the considered dependencies are characterized by a high degreeof probability (sometimes 82.5%). The average degree of probability is 16.2% of all considered dependencies, and only 1.3% of the considered – with low probability. The average probability of the direct component of organizational dependencies is about 80%, and antinomic – about 20%, respectively In general, taking into account the internal structure of organizational dependencies of natural territorial systems makes it possible to avoid certain mistakes in their application.

https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2022-2-36-45
PDF (Українська)

References

Anokhin P.K. (1978) Selected works. Philosophical aspects of the theory of a functional system. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 399 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Анохин П. К. Избранные труды. Философские аспекты теории функциональной системы. Москва: Наука, 1978. 399 с.]

Bogdanov A.A. (1925) General organizational science. Tectology. Leningrad: Book, 1925. Vol.1. 194 s. [In Ukrainian]. [Богданов А. А. Всеобщая организационная наука. Тектология. Ленинград: Книга, 1925. Т.1. n194 с.]

Golubets M.A. (2005) Introduction to geosociosystemology. Lviv: Polly, 2005. 199 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Голубець М. А. Вступ до геосоціосистемології. Львів: Поллі, 2005. 199 с.]

Zgurovsky M.Z., Dobronogov A.V., Pomerantseva T.N. (1997) Research of social pr ocesses on the basis of system analysis methodology. Kyiv: 1997. 218 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Згуровский М. З., Доброногов А. В., Померанцева Т. Н. Исследование социальных процессов на основе методологии системного анализа. Киев: 1997. 218 с.]

Krasnoshchekov G.P., Rosenberg G.S. (2001) Ecology “in law” (theoretical constructions of nmodern ecology in quotations and aphorisms). RAS, Institute of Ecology of the Volga Basin, n Togliatti: 2001. 315 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Краснощеков Г. П., Розенберг Г. С. Экология «в законе» (теоретические конструкции современной экологии в цитатах и афоризмах). РАН, Институт экологии Волжского бассейна, Тольятти: 2001. 315 с.]

Melnik L.G. (2012) Theory of selforganization of economic systems. Sumy: University Book, 2012. 439 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Мельник Л. Г. Теория самоорганизации экономических систем. Сумы: Университетская книга, 2012. 439 с.]

Musienko M.M., Serebryakov V.V., Brion O.V. (2002) Ecology. Nature protection: Dictionaryreference book. Kyiv: T-vo Znannia, KOO, 2002. 550 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Мусієнко М. М., Серебряков В. В., Брайон О. В. Екологія. Охорона природи: Словник-довідник. Київ: Т-во Знання, КОО, 2002. 550 с.]

Pashchenko V.M. (1993) Theoretical problems of landscape science. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1993. 283 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Пащенко В. М. Теоретические проблемы ландшафтоведения. Киев: Наукова думка, 1993. 283 с.]

Petlin V.M. (2009) Methodology and methods of experimental landscape research. Lviv: LNU Publishing Center named after Ivan Franko, 2009. 400 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Петлін В. М. Методологія та методика експериментальних ландшафтознавчих досліджень. Львів: Видавничий центр ЛНУ ім. Івана Франка, 2009. 400 с.]

Petlin, V.M. (2016) Theory of natural territorial systems: in 4 vols. T. 2. Natural territorial systems: concepts, paradigms, organization. Lviv: Ivan Franko Lviv National University Publishing Center, 2016. 624 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Петлін, В.М. Теорія природних територіальних систем: у 4-х т. Т. 2. Природні територіальні системи: концепції, парадигми, організація. Львів: Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, 2016. 624 с.]

Petlin, V.M. (2016) Theory of natural territorial systems: in 4 vols. T. 4. Theoretical foundations of anthropogenic use of natural territorial systems. Methods and modern areas of research. Lviv: Ivan Franko Lviv National University Publishing Center, 2016. 436 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Петлін, В. М. Теорія природних територіальних систем: у 4-х т. Т. 4. Теоретичні основи антропогенного використання природних територіальних систем. Методика і сучасні напрямки досліджень. Львів: Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, 2016. 436 с.]

Potish L.A. (2008) Ecology. Kyiv: Znannia, 2008. 272 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Потіш Л. А. Екологія. Київ: Знання, 2008. 272 с.]

Preobrazhensky V.S., Alexandrova T.D., Kupriyanova T.P. (1988) Fundamentals of landscape analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 192 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Преображенский В. С., Александрова Т. Д., Куприянова Т. П. Основы ландшафтного анализа. Москва: Наука, 1988. 192 с.]

Khoroshev A.V. (2016) Multiscale organization of the geographical landscape. Moscow: KMK, 2016. 416 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Хорошев А.В. Полимасштабная организация географического ландшафта. Москва: КМК, 2016. 416 с.]

Aesthetics and landscape design: a textbook. Ed. E.I. Golubeva, T.O. King. (2010) Moscow: KnoRus Publishing House, 2010. 448 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Эстетика и дизайн ландшафта: учебное пособие. Под ред. Е. И. Голубевой, Т. О. Король. Москва: Изд-во КноРус, 2010. 448 с.]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Валерій Миколайович Петлін