Keywords
Right-Bank Ukraine
Volhynian Governorate
personnel composition
confessional balance
townspeople (meshchane)
Jews
estate-based justice
pre-reform justice
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to provide a comprehensive historical and legal analysis of the formation and functioning of the magistrate personnel in Right - Bank Ukraine, based on materials from the Volhynian Governorate in 1831 – 1864. Drawing upon legal acts and service records ( formular lists ) in the context of imperial policies aimed at the unification and centralization of judicial power, the study examines this cadre. The methodological basis of the study rests on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity, alongside historical - legal, prosopographical, and comparative analyses of regulatory acts, service records, and administrative documentation of magistrates and district courts. The work employs systematic and comparative approaches, which enabled the reconstruction of a sociological portrait of elected and appointed magistrate officials and a comparative characterization of magistrate and district court staffing systems. The scientific novelty lies in a comprehensive historical and legal analysis of the legal status, staffing mechanisms, confessional balance, and social characteristics of the magistrate corps based on regulatory legal acts and service records. This approach allows for an understanding of magistrates as instruments of imperial integration of the urban population and confessional policy, while also elucidating the reasons for their abolition on the eve of the Judicial Reform of 1864. Conclusions. The study shows that magistrates functioned as hybrid institutions with formal self - government and real administrative control exercised through the confirmation of elected officials and the appointment of secretaries. Personnel policy was based on a confessional balance (between Christians and Jews) with the targeted involvement of Orthodox townspeople ( meshchane ) and a dualistic structure: elected, unpaid officials from among the townspeople and merchants, and appointed, paid secretaries and clerks ( kantseliarysty ) from the nobility. An analysis of service records revealed limited education, lack of property, practical experience, and low salaries of clerks. Systemic problems (limited personnel reserve, unprofessionalism, bureaucratic procedures, underfunding, corruption) and comparisons with district ( uezd ) courts demonstrated the inefficiency of the magistrate model.References
DAZhO – Derzhavnyi arkhiv Zhytomyrskoi oblasti. [State Archives of Zhytomyr Region].
Diatlov, V. A. (2012). eculiarities of the Social Status of the Officialdom of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (on the Example of Penza and Saratov Provinces). Izvestiia Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskicheskogo universiteta im. V.G. Belinskogo – Proceedings of the Penza State Pedagogical University named after V.G. Belinsky, 27, 601–604. [in Russian].
Dityatin, I. I. (1875). Organization and Administration of the Cities of Russia. Vol.
Sankt-Peterburg, 508 s. [in Russian].
Dityatin, I. I. (1877). Organization and Administration of the Cities of Russia. Vol.
Yaroslavl, 565 s. [in Russian].
Dolbilov, M. (2010). Russian Land, Alien Faith: Imperial Ethno-Confessional Policy in Lithuania and Belarus under Alexander II. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 1000 s. [in Russian].
Dubrovina, A. B. (1966). Social Order, Governance Mechanisms and Law of Ukraine during the Decline of the Feudal-Serf System (First Half of the 19th Century). Kyiv: Kyiv State University, 111 s. [in Ukrainian].
Dzhanshiev, G. A. (1891). Foundations of the Judicial Reform (On the 25th Anniversary of the New Court). Moskva: Tipografiia M. P. Shchepkina, 364 s. [in Russian].
Efremova, N. N. (1983). Ministry of Justice of the Russian Empire. 1802–1917. (Historical and Legal Research). Moskva: Nauka, 152 s. [in Russian].
Emelianova, I. A. (1962). Highest Bodies of State Authority and Administration of Russia in the Pre-Reform Period. Kazan, 46 s. [in Russian].
Gorizontov, L. (1999). Paradoxes of Imperial Policy: Poles in Russia and Russians in Poland (19th – Early 20th Centuries). Moskva: Izdatelstvo "Indrik", 272 s. [in Russian].
Kamanin, I. M. (1888). The Last Years of Kyiv's Self-Government under Magdeburg Law. Kiev: Tipografiia G. T. Korchak-Novitskogo, 93 s. [in Russian].
Kappeler, A. (2005). Russia as a Multi-Ethnic Empire: Emergence, History, Decline. Lviv: Vyd-vo Katolytskoho Ukrainskoho universytetu, 360 s. [in Ukrainian].
Karlina, O. (2007). Conflict between the traditions of urban self-government and the system of urban administration in Volyn at the end of the 18th - in the first decades of the 19th century. Sotsium – Society, 7, 280-289. [in Ukrainian].
Khadadova, F. (2013). Main directions of activity of the Zhytomyr City Magistrate (late 18th – 40s of the 19th century). Hurzhiivski istorychni chytannia: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats – Hurzhiyiv Historical Readings: Collection of Scientific Works, 6, 267-269. [in Ukrainian].
Khadadova, F. (2014). Functioning of the Magistrates of Volyn as Judicial Bodies (Late 18th – First Half of the 19th Century). Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi ta vsesvitnoi istorii – Actual Problems of National and World History, 17, 173-178. [in Ukrainian].
Moriakova, O. V. (1998). The System of Local Administration in Russia under Nicholas I. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 272 s. [in Russian].
Petrovsky-Shtern, Y. (2019). Shtetl: The Golden Age of the Jewish Town. Kyiv: Krytyka, 394 s. [in Ukrainian].
Pryshchepa, O. P. (2002). Legal and economic aspects of the development of privately owned towns in Volyn in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Problemy istorii Ukrainy XIX – pochatku XX st. – Problems of History of Ukraine of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries, 5, 128–132. [in Ukrainian].
PSZRI-1 – Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Series I (1649–1825). Saint Petersburg. [in Russian].
PSZRI-2 – Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii [Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire]. Series II (1825–1881). Saint Petersburg. [in Russian].
Sarazhina, R. (2011). The Judicial System in Western Siberia in Imperial Policy in the Late 18th – Mid-19th Centuries. (Extended abstract of candidate's thesis). Omsk, 25 s. [in Russian].
Shandra, V. (2016). Burgher Bodies of Estate Self-Government in Ukraine (Late 18th – Early 20th Centuries) (O. Reient, Ed.). NAN Ukrainy. Instytut istorii Ukrainy. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy, 345 s. [in Ukrainian].
Shandra, V. S. (2019). From the liquidation of the remnants of Magdeburg law to self-government according to the Russian model (the last quarter of the 18th - early 1860s). Vid muriv do bulvariv: tvorennia modernoho mista v Ukraini (kinets XVIII - pochatok XX st.) – From Walls to Boulevards: The Creation of a Modern City in Ukraine (Late 18th - Early 20th Century), 28–77). Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, A. (2021). Imperial construction of the judicial system for townspeople of Right-Bank Ukraine (1797–1801). Arkhivy Ukrainy – Archives of Ukraine, 1 (326), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.47315/archives2021.326.163 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, A. (2025). Officials and clerks of the Zhytomyr District Court (1831–1863): historical-legal dimension. Society and Security, 2(8), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.26642/sas-2025-2(8)-103-113 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, A. V. (2022). Sudova vlada v zhytti suspilstva Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy (kinets XVIII – persha tretyna XIX st.) [Judicial Authority in the Life of Society of Right-Bank Ukraine (Late 18th – First Third of the 19th Century)]. Zhytomyr: Vydavets Yevenok O. O., 580 s. [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, A., & Melnychuk, O. (2026). The head and assessors of the Zhytomyr district court (1831–1863): historical, legal, and social dimensions. Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History, 55, 72-86. https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2026-55-72-86 [in Ukrainian].
Snyder, T. (2012). The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera, 460 c. [in Ukrainian].
Wortman, R. S. (2004). The Development of Legal Consciousness in Imperial Russia. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 520 s. [in Russian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrii V. Shevchuk, Tetiana K. Overkovska